Free · no account

What's holding your site back in Google and ChatGPT?

Paste your address. We fetch 25 pages, language versions included, and tell you exactly what's wrong and on which address, in plain English.

25 pages in about 3 secondsLanguage versions countNo email up front

What the scan measures

Six categories, seventeen checks: a complete technical SEO audit in miniature. Five categories any good scanner does; the sixth, language, takes a scanner that reads language versions as one cluster.
  • Title & description

    Search result

    Title missing, too long or duplicated. Description missing, too short or duplicated, and in the language of the page, not just "identical". With a Google preview exactly as the searcher sees it.
  • Status & sitemap

    Reachable & indexable

    Status code per page, redirects with their destination, canonical present and self-referencing, noindex where it belongs. And: is every page in the sitemap, language versions included as alternates.
  • Headings & text

    Content

    Exactly one H1 per page, heading jumps (H1 → H3) that break the structure, and thin pages under 300 words. Eight pages with the same heading jump are usually one template, so one fix.
  • TTFB & images

    Speed

    Time to first byte per page, compression on the HTML, and images over 100 KB, with the file name, so you know which image to shrink.
  • og:image & llms.txt

    Sharing & AI

    og:title, og:description and og:image for share cards on WhatsApp and LinkedIn, Twitter Card, and llms.txt, so ChatGPT and Claude read your site the way you intended.
  • Only here

    Language & hreflang

    Does every language version point to every other, and back? Does html lang match the content? Is the description translated, or is there quietly a Dutch text on your English page? Outside scanners call that "duplicate". That's a different fault with a different fix.

From finding to fix

Not a list of 82 lines, but three things you do today. The scan groups by cause, not by address.
  1. Sort by impact

    Whatever sits in one template goes to the top. Eight pages with a heading jump are one fault. You see at a glance where one change fixes the most.
  2. See the address

    Never "improve your meta descriptions". Instead: these three addresses, this text, this is what the searcher sees in Google right now.
  3. Apply it

    On Neuramerce, automatically: missing descriptions are written in your brand voice and logged, so you can measure the effect. Anything that needs a decision becomes a task with the reason attached.

A crawler sees what Google sees. We also see what's behind it.

3 of 3 models
Compare3 models
Outside scanner
This site scan
On Neuramerce, every week
Description in the wrong language
Sees three identical texts and says "duplicate"
Untranslated, named per language
Fixed from the translation chain
Translation outdated after a source change
Invisible
Invisible
Reported per field and per language
hreflang cluster complete and reciprocal
Only what happens to be in the HTML
All 25 pages checked
From the slug register, for every page
Language versions in the sitemap
"Not in sitemap", often wrongly
Reads alternates in the sitemap
Generates them itself
Findings on a redirect
Measures the destination, reports the source
Skipped; status and destination shown
Route conflicts actively reported
EAN, price, stock, feed eligibility
No
No
Yes, before Google rejects the feed
Structured data per page type
Notes that it's missing
Notes that it's missing
Generates it
Repair
A fix plan in a call
Report with a fix per finding
Fixed or queued as a task, effect measured

Frequently asked questions about the site scan

Is the scan really free?
Yes. Score, categories, the main findings and the Google preview are visible right away, no account needed. The full report with all 25 pages goes to your inbox. That's what we ask your email address for, nothing else.
What is a technical SEO audit?
A check of everything Google needs before your content even counts: can the page load, is it in the sitemap, does it have one H1, a title and a description, does it point correctly to its language versions, does it load fast enough. This site scan is that audit in miniature: 25 pages, automated, in 3 seconds. It's not about whether your copy is good, but about whether Google and ChatGPT can take it in properly at all.
What is a good score?
Above 85 is healthy: the rest is maintenance. Below 70 there's usually one structural fault in a template that ripples across dozens of pages. You fix that once. Look less at the total and more at the category that stands out: a site can score 90 and still have pages showing the wrong language in Google.
How accurate is it?
We measure what's in the HTML, on 25 pages from your sitemap, language versions included. What we deliberately don't do: attach findings to a page that redirects, or call a language version "missing from the sitemap" when it's listed as an alternate. Those are the two noise sources we see most often in other scanners.
Why do language versions count?
Because that's where the fault sits most often and shows least. An English page with a Dutch description isn't broken. It just sits wrong in Google, and nobody notices. A scanner that only says "duplicate description" sends you to the wrong fix.
How often should I run an SEO audit?
After every bigger change: a new template, a new language, a migration. On Neuramerce you don't have to choose: the scan runs every Monday and the tasks are there on Tuesday.
Will this improve my Google ranking?
Not by itself. The audit removes what's holding you back; what you rank for after that is decided by your content. Anyone promising a top position based on a technical scan is promising something that can't be promised.
What happens to my data?
We keep your scan for 30 days, then it's gone. We use your email address for the report and a short series of tips for your platform; unsubscribe with one click, and we don't sell anything on.

We don't deliver a fix plan. We fix it.

Connect your shop and the scan runs every Monday. What's unambiguous gets fixed; what needs a decision is ready as a task on Tuesday, with the reason attached.